Before reading this I’d like you to consider the following quote from an article, published in 2009, in relation to the “Baby P” case... The article was concerned with the facts behind those responsible for the slaughter of this child trying every trick in the book to abdicate responsibility for their actions...
“Defence lawyers for Baby Peter's mother and her boyfriend had argued before the case that the pair could not receive a fair trial because of their notoriety over his torture and death. “
Prior to a report on Day 5, complete lunacy is what fills the pages of “Hollie Demands Justice” today as we enter week 2 of the Robert Green Trial... It’s high time the crank behind this idiocy faced the simple truth that what she’s doing is stupid and dangerous and DAMAGING the prospects of Hollie ever obtaining justice... Consider this (redacted) quote from the site...
"Conspicuously absent from the line-up of 22 civilian witnesses last week (yes, the same number as Hollie’s alleged former abusers, yet these included others than on that particular list) were XXXXX and XXXX XXXXXX, Hollie’s XXXXXX and XXXXXX who are somewhere in Portugal or possibly Brazil, doubtless still busy tormenting children. The case against them is cast-iron, having being confirmed by police expert and medical evidence."
I’m actually treading dangerous ground legally by even quoting the above piffle in redacted form! -such is the damaging nature of it to Hollie's objectives! However...
Personally I am convinced of the case against these two; but my mere opinion won’t put them behind bars. Nor will yours. – The opinion of a ‘Police Expert’ won’t convict them either. It’s for a court to decide; to prove that beyond any reasonable doubt, those two men raped Hollie Greig. And unlike the relatively trivial summary charge against Green, the matter of rape will be heard before a jury. There is a big problem with that...
Whilst in a summary trial one can expect a professional judge to be ‘immune’ to public opinion, press reports or other sources of bias; juries are drawn from the ranks of the ordinary. The people sitting on them have no legal training and are not immune from personal bias... And it was on that basis that Baby Peter’s Mother and her Boyfriend sought to appeal...
Of course; in that particular case the evidence actually was damning and wide-ranging – yet still these individuals sought to appeal. In Hollie’s case it’s spectacularly stupid and completely dishonest to describe the case as “cast iron”. Let alone lay further allegations in this manner. Even at the time it was reported to the Police it would have been a “tall order” to prosecute Hollie’s case based on what evidence there was available.
If you’re honest, and you’ve any idea how the law works, you have to admit that the one eye-witness there might have been is dead - killed in deeply suspicious circumstances; but still very much dead! The assaults were many years ago – it would take a miracle to obtain forensic evidence to support the case. And the subject, the victim of this crime, is a very vulnerable witness...
– That is the reason why, in my opinion ( and for me to offer the following without making it clear it is mere opinion and not fact is actionable ) – in my opinion the Officer in charge binned the case to save their budget and to save their stats... It was just going to be too much like hard work!
Even very strong, well educated sharp-minded women are ‘broken’ by the often vicious defence counsel engaged by rapists...
I’ll quote again here from the Daily Mail article where it relates to us the reality of how defence lawyers may treat a vulnerable witness. In this case a four-year-old girl who had been brutally raped by this man two years previously...
“The little girl's shocking testimony was at the centre of the trial, and she was forced to endure cross- examination so severe that she called the room where she gave her evidence the 'evil room'. “
“Her rapist's defence team is now considered 'certain' to launch an appeal against that conviction, a legal source revealed. The source said: 'They consider the verdict to be almost inconsequential. They intend to take the case straight to the Court of Appeal.' “
Defence counsel Bernard Richmond, QC claimed...
“There comes a point where, with respect, one bends over far too far for a child witness to get a fair trial.“
My opinion of Richmond for coming out with this is very low; he is little better than a rapist himself for saying that or putting a tiny child through what he did! But it illustrates well the mentality of these people and the reality of prosecuting such a case. And this is just a taste of the reality of what bringing Hollie Greig’s rapists to book means...
Hollie of course is a young woman with a mental age somewhat comparable with a child in her early to mid teens; as such far more robust than a four year old. But, as the Father of a fifteen year old myself, I am only too aware of the vulnerability of a child that sort of age... Hollie’s bravery is astonishing.
But “cast Iron”? Seriously? You can’t get more dishonest than painting the roses red, and it serves no legitimate end. – As I’ve already made clear; it’s exactly this sort of thing that makes it IMPOSSIBLE for the mainstream press to get near Hollie Greig’s case!
And not for the first time work done in an effort to clear the way for mainstream coverage has been thwarted - This piffle, coming as it did just hours after my public appeal for mainstream colleagues to attend to the case, was brought to my attention by a colleague forced to ABANDON a piece he had hoped to run in one of the better-known Scottish papers tomorrow!
If anyone's curious about why the mainstream press aren't covering this case it's because they CAN'T! - They can't thanks to stupid stupid people like the author of that idiotic article on 'Hollie Demands Justice today! This isn't the first time an mainstream piece has been 'blocked' this way; and I'm honestly beginning to wonder if we don't have history repeating itself with another 'GLW' masquerading as a campaigner for justice when all the time they have a hidden and malicious agenda!
...As if there were not enough barriers and obstacles to bringing these rapists to court . that damn bloody fool of a woman who writes this tosh insists and insists and insists in her pig-headed stupidity and ignorance-spawned arrogance on naming names when she must by now be fully aware of the consequences!
ARE YOU TOO STUPID TO PICK UP A COPY OF McNAES, READ IT AND STUDY WHAT THE LAW IS ON THESE MATTERS? - OR IS IT SHEER ARROGANCE? - IT IS FACT MADAM - PROVABLE FACT THAT CAN BE VERIFIED BY ANYONE - FACT THAT YOUR ACTIONS ARE SEWING THE SEEDS FOR HOLLIE GREIG'S RAPISTS TO PLAY THE 'BARRY GEORGE' CARD!
THE FACT IS, IF THESE MEN WALK OUT OF COURT LAUGHING UP THEIR SLEEVES AT THOSE WHO ARE WORKING SO HARD TO BRING THEM TO ACCOUNT THE RESPONSIBILITY WILL REST FIRMLY IN YOUR LAP!
What's worse is that if her assertion that they continue in the abuse of other children is correct, and if it becomes possible to bring them to book for any of that - she may still be creating for them the sort of 'notoriety' that facilitates them 'bleating' about being unable to get a fair trial!!! - Not happy with screwing up one rape victim's chances of justice she's wrecking that of others...
As for the matter in hand – Robert Green is on trial for Breach of the peace! As he was highlighting himself at the beginning of the trial; it’s not about any other issue! The idiot who writes this claptrap would do well to consider if she might be helping to tighten the noose around Robert Green’s neck – As well as creating ‘get out of jail free’ cards for Hollie’s rapists!
The original article about Baby Peter's abuser is here...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1176968/Baby-P-killers-human-rights-outrage-sadist-set-appeal-rape-conviction-girl-2.html
